I was at my youngest son’s high school baseball game last
night, and my wife and I chose to sit in seats that were somewhat away from the
other parents on the team. We chose the spot not to be antisocial, but so that
we could have a fuller view of the entire field – we hate obstructed-view
seats!
After we’d been there for a while one of the other dads came
over and sat down next to me and said, “Man, I wish I’d waited until you guys
got here ‘cause I got my chair in the wrong place, and I don’t wanna be rude
and move now. They’re all over there talking non-stop, and none of it’s about
baseball; not even this game.”
It got me thinking about the difference between satisfaction
and engagement (Yeah, I know. I can’t help it.)
You see those folks sitting over there talking were very
happy to be at the game and socialize – and maybe even miss a play, hit, or
pitch. That’s satisfaction.
For my wife (Chaney) and I, and that other dad, we’re happy
to be there, and we’re willing to socialize
between innings, but we don’t want to miss any of the action on the field.
We’re not only there because our kids are playing; we’re also real baseball fans.
That’s engagement.
Satisfaction is great and it’s a nice goal for companies to
reach for – it means they care about their employees. But engagement is a
difference maker. With engagement they’re not only satisfied, they’re giving
that extra effort that turns into positive results on the bottom line for their
organization.
Employee engagement is all about how the employee feels
about the employer, and specifically the extra effort they’re willing to give.
That’s how you determine engagement – with that extra effort
– not satisfaction, and that’s why companies with a higher level of engagement
outperform those with lower engagement (or worse, disengagement).
The key with engagement is the reciprocal relationship
between the two: What extra effort is the employer willing to give in return?
If employees don’t have that connection with the employer, there’s virtually no
chance for engagement.
That’s where managers come in.
Managers at all levels play a very important role in the
engagement equation because they are the ones with whom employees (direct
reports) have the most contact – to many employees their manager IS the company.
Good managers are in tune with their people and know how to
motivate each of them individually. If they’re effective, that can lead to
engagement and the extra effort that comes with it. The payback for managers is
better personnel development, better unit performance and better company
performance – it’s a can’t lose proposition.
It’s good to have satisfied employees. It’s great to have engaged employees.
If you want to improve yourself as a manager, ask yourself
this question: Are my people there to socialize, or are they there to watch the
game?
No comments:
Post a Comment